linux-kernel - Re: sdhci can turn off irq up to 200 ms

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4A55C631.7030103@parrot.com>
Date:	Thu, 9 Jul 2009 12:28:01 +0200
From:	Matthieu CASTET <matthieu.castet@...rot.com>
To:	<pierre@...man.eu>
CC:	<sdhci-devel@...ts.ossman.eu>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: sdhci can turn off irq up to 200 ms

Matthieu CASTET a écrit :
> Hi,
> 
> sdhci code got tasklets (sdhci_tasklet_card and sdhci_tasklet_finish),
> that does :
> {
> spin_lock_irqsave
> 
> if (cond) {
> sdhci_reset
> sdhci_reset
> }
> 
> spin_unlock_irqrestore
> }
> 
> The problem is that sdhci_reset [1] does busy pooling on a register up
> to a timeout of 100 ms.
> That's not low latency friendly.
> 
> On our system, we saw that sdhci_reset take 1 ms. That should be because
> we enter in mdelay, even if the hardware clears the bit faster.
> I wonder why there is an mdelay(1). Using cpu_relax and
> time_is_after_jiffies should make sdhci_reset faster.
> 
In case somebody cares, here a patch that reduce on our hardware
sdhci_reset from 1 ms to 30 us.


Matthieu

View attachment "sdhci.diff" of type "text/x-diff" (764 bytes)