linux-kernel - Re: [patch 000/108] 2.6.30-stable review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4A4B7A77.8010208@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
Date:	Wed, 01 Jul 2009 17:02:15 +0200
From:	Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>
To:	Julien BLACHE <jb@...ache.org>
CC:	Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	stable@...nel.org, stable-review@...nel.org,
	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk, felixb@....com
Subject: Re: [patch 000/108] 2.6.30-stable review

Julien BLACHE wrote:
> Felix wrote it was a candidate for stable (obviously!) but it's not on
> the list you posted. Care to include it?

I am routinely astonished by the "please include patch XY" postings. :-)
Have a look at 
http://lxr.linux.no/linux/Documentation/stable_kernel_rules.txt -- this 
explains how you get a patch included with minimum effort by everyone 
involved.  IOW, send the patch¹, not the question.  :-)

¹) if the patch is actually applicable to the kernel and fulfills the 
stable criteria.  If in doubt about the latter, the respective subsystem 
developers might help you figure it out.)
-- 
Stefan Richter
-=====-==--= -=== ----=
http://arcgraph.de/sr/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/