[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87hbxwcswp.fsf@sonic.technologeek.org>
Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2009 17:41:26 +0200
From: Julien BLACHE <jb@...ache.org>
To: Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>
Cc: Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
stable@...nel.org, stable-review@...nel.org,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk, felixb@....com
Subject: Re: [patch 000/108] 2.6.30-stable review
Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de> wrote:
Hi,
>> Felix wrote it was a candidate for stable (obviously!) but it's not on
>> the list you posted. Care to include it?
>
> I am routinely astonished by the "please include patch XY" postings. :-)
Actually I was under the impression that the proper request had been
made for inclusion into -stable, but it looks like it's not been done
after all.
So, here goes.
JB.
--
Julien BLACHE <http://www.jblache.org>
<jb@...ache.org> GPG KeyID 0xF5D65169
View attachment "xfs_2.6.30_memleak_fix.patch" of type "text/x-diff" (890 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists