[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090701211117.GC631@elte.hu>
Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 23:11:17 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
paulus@...ba.org, arnd@...db.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] FRV: Implement atomic64_t
* Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> On Wed, 1 Jul 2009, David Howells wrote:
> > +
> > +#define ATOMIC64_INIT(i) { (i) }
> > +#define atomic64_read(v) ((v)->counter)
> > +#define atomic64_set(v, i) (((v)->counter) = (i))
>
> These seem to be buggy.
>
> At least "atomic64_read()" needs to make sure to actually read it
> atomically - otherwise you'll do two 32-bit reads, and that just
> gets crap. Imagine if somebody is adding 1 to 0x00000000ffffffff,
> and then "atomic64_read()" reads it as two accesses in the wrong
> place, and gets either 0, or 0x00000001ffffffff, both of which are
> totally incorrect.
>
> The case of 'atomic64_set()' is _slightly_ less clear, because I
> think we use it mostly for initializers, so atomicity is often not
> strictly required. But at least on x86, we do guarantee that it
> sets it atomically too.
>
> Btw, Ingo: I looked at the x86-32 versions to be sure, and noticed
> a couple of buglets:
thanks - we'll fix these!
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists