[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090701211411.GD631@elte.hu>
Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 23:14:11 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Robin Getz <rgetz@...ckfin.uclinux.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
vapier.adi@...il.com, lethal@...ux-sh.org
Subject: Re: [RFC v2] kernel/printk.c - handling more than one CON_BOOT
* Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> > > I think it would be useful if we had a description of the new
> > > design, similar to your description of the "Today" behaviour
> > > above. Perhaps as a comment over register_console()?
> >
> > Can do - do you want it as v3 or on-top of this one?
>
> I'm easy either way. Ingo might have applied to one of his trees,
> in which case a replacement patch might cause him problems, dunno.
Not yet - i was waiting for feedback from you and Linus. Would be
nice to have a from-scratch v3 that adresses all the review
feedback.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists