lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4A4C887F.2050508@redhat.com>
Date:	Thu, 02 Jul 2009 18:14:23 +0800
From:	Amerigo Wang <amwang@...hat.com>
To:	Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>
CC:	Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, Eugene Teo <eteo@...hat.com>,
	viro@...iv.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: [Patch] allow file truncations when both suid and write  permissions
 set

Eric Paris wrote:
> So NAK on both Amerigo's and Eric's patch.  ATTR_FORCE is wrong.
> ATTR_FORCE here is going to force the security system to accept ALL of
> the attr changes, not just the ATTR_KILL_SUID and/or ATTR_KILL_SGID you
> |= in from should_remove_suid.
> You need to follow esandeen's recommendation, change file_remove_suid()
> to dentry_remove_suid() and then use dentry_remove_suid() in do_truncate
> instead of what you are currently trying to do (and I think that's
> supposed to be done under the i_mutex right?)
>   
But file_remove_suid() actually adds ATTR_FORCE too, in __remove_suid()...

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ