[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1246536739.22562.73.camel@dhcp235-23.rdu.redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 02 Jul 2009 08:12:19 -0400
From: Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>
To: Amerigo Wang <amwang@...hat.com>
Cc: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, Eugene Teo <eteo@...hat.com>,
viro@...iv.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: [Patch] allow file truncations when both suid and write
permissions set
On Thu, 2009-07-02 at 18:14 +0800, Amerigo Wang wrote:
> Eric Paris wrote:
> > So NAK on both Amerigo's and Eric's patch. ATTR_FORCE is wrong.
> > ATTR_FORCE here is going to force the security system to accept ALL of
> > the attr changes, not just the ATTR_KILL_SUID and/or ATTR_KILL_SGID you
> > |= in from should_remove_suid.
> > You need to follow esandeen's recommendation, change file_remove_suid()
> > to dentry_remove_suid() and then use dentry_remove_suid() in do_truncate
> > instead of what you are currently trying to do (and I think that's
> > supposed to be done under the i_mutex right?)
> >
> But file_remove_suid() actually adds ATTR_FORCE too, in __remove_suid()...
The difference being that it adds it to a private ia_valid that ONLY
contains the SUID/SGID bits that we need to force the removal of. Not
to the ia_valid that contains ATTR_SIZE and ATTR_FILE.
-Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists