linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] vt: add an event interface

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20090703163358.GA19685@elte.hu>
Date:	Fri, 3 Jul 2009 18:33:58 +0200
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vt: add an event interface


* Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk> wrote:

> > > Ingo, if you've nothing better to do than quote out of context 
> > > and be offensive, perhaps you should go fix voyager support or 
> > > something productive instead.
> > >
> > Another question: i'm wondering why you brought up Voyager 
> > support here. Are you trying to insult me?
> 
> [and]
> 
> > Pointing out when your code is unclean does not count as an 
> > offense on lkml, i hope
> 
> Nor then I trust does pointing out that voyager needs a bit of 
> work ;)

Voyager is not upstream anymore so i dont understand your point ...

I do think the Voyager code needs a lot of work, and i reviewed the 
patches that were submitted. I'm aware of no Voyager patch series 
that i find acceptable, and the things i noticed so far already mean 
quite a bit of work.

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/