[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87ocs1aall.fsf@basil.nowhere.org>
Date: Fri, 03 Jul 2009 20:24:22 +0200
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
mingo@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -tip] x86: atomic64: inline atomic64_read()
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org> writes:
> On Fri, 3 Jul 2009 20:04:50 +0200
> Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:
>
>> > +static inline u64 atomic64_read(atomic64_t *ptr)
>> > +{
>> > + u64 res;
>> > +
>> > + asm volatile(
>> > + "mov %%ebx, %%eax\n\t"
>> > + "mov %%ecx, %%edx\n\t"
>> > + LOCK_PREFIX "cmpxchg8b %1\n"
>
> also afaik cmpxchg implies the lock prefix, so no need to make an
> explicit one... it just adds code size and alternatives-work
No it doesn't; LOCK is implied for "xchg", but not for cmpxchg
-Andi
--
ak@...ux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists