[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87k52paaja.fsf@basil.nowhere.org>
Date: Fri, 03 Jul 2009 20:25:45 +0200
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
mingo@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -tip] x86: atomic64: inline atomic64_read()
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> writes:
>
> Is the same true of XADD as well? If yes then we can remove the lock
> prefix from those as well - there's a few uses of that on 32-bit and
> 64-bit as well.
XADD also has no implicit LOCK. AFAIK the implicit semantics are
only true for XCHG.
-Andi
--
ak@...ux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists