[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090705224823.5679075f@infradead.org>
Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2009 22:48:23 -0700
From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
To: Amerigo Wang <amwang@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@...e.com>,
Yan Zheng <zheng.yan@...cle.com>,
Josef Bacik <jbacik@...hat.com>,
Chris Mason <chris.mason@...cle.com>,
Amerigo Wang <amwang@...hat.com>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org,
Sven Wegener <sven.wegener@...aler.net>
Subject: Re: [Patch] btrfs: use file_remove_suid() after i_mutex is held
On Mon, 6 Jul 2009 01:29:14 -0400
Amerigo Wang <amwang@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> file_remove_suid() should be called with i_mutex held,
> file_update_time() too. So move them after mutex_lock().
>
> Plus, check the return value of kmalloc().
>
> Signed-off-by: WANG Cong <amwang@...hat.com>
>
> ---
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/file.c b/fs/btrfs/file.c
> index 7c3cd24..cd36301 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/file.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/file.c
> @@ -944,14 +944,17 @@ static ssize_t btrfs_file_write(struct file
> *file, const char __user *buf, if (count == 0)
> goto out_nolock;
>
> + mutex_lock(&inode->i_mutex);
> +
> err = file_remove_suid(file);
> if (err)
> - goto out_nolock;
> + goto out;
> file_update_time(file);
>
> pages = kmalloc(nrptrs * sizeof(struct page *), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!pages)
> + goto out;
>
Hi,
I don't think you can keep this at GFP_KERNEL once you hold i_mutex....
very likely this needs to now turn into GFP_NOFS!
--
Arjan van de Ven Intel Open Source Technology Centre
For development, discussion and tips for power savings,
visit http://www.lesswatts.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists