[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090706084537.GB28145@one.firstfloor.org>
Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 10:45:37 +0200
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
Cc: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>, andi@...stfloor.org,
arjan@...radead.org, matthew@....cx, jens.axboe@...cle.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, douglas.w.styner@...el.com,
chinang.ma@...el.com, terry.o.prickett@...el.com,
matthew.r.wilcox@...el.com, Eric.Moore@....com,
DL-MPTFusionLinux@....com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: >10% performance degradation since 2.6.18
> That seems to presume it is impossible to reprogram the NIC RX queue
> selection rules?
>
> If you can add a new 'flow' to a NIC hardware RX queue, surely you can
> imagine a remove + add operation for a migrated 'flow'... and thus, at
> least on the NIC hardware level, flows can follow processes.
The standard on modern NIC hardware is stateless hashing: as in you
don't program in flows, but the hardware just uses a fixed hash
to map the header to a rx queue. You can't really significantly influence
the hash on a per flow basis there (in theory you could chose
specific local port numbers, but you can't do that for the remote
ports or for well known sockets)
There are a few highend NICs that optionally support arbitary flow matching,
but it typically only supports a very limited number of flows
(so you need some fallback anyways) and of course it would
be costly to reprogram the NIC on every socket state change.
-Andi
--
ak@...ux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists