[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1246870279.8143.4.camel@twins>
Date: Mon, 06 Jul 2009 10:51:19 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To: mitake@....info.waseda.ac.jp
Cc: fweisbec@...il.com, mingo@...e.hu, acme@...hat.com,
andi@...stfloor.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][RFC] Adding information of counts processes acquired
how many spinlocks to schedstat
On Mon, 2009-07-06 at 14:20 +0900, mitake@....info.waseda.ac.jp wrote:
> Thanks. I could install libelf with your way.
>
> And sorry for my late response.
> Because adding counting spin lock to perfcounters is more difficult
> than I excepted...
>
> When the process watched by perf tries to lock a spinlock
> this will be the nest of spinlock,
> because perfcounters subsystem also uses spinlock.
>
> Is there any way to avoid the nest of lock?
> I want any advice...
swcounters should be able to deal with this recursion, but I have other
concerns with this.. see below.
> This is the temporal patch I wrote,
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/perf_counter.h b/include/linux/perf_counter.h
> index 5e970c7..f65a473 100644
> --- a/include/linux/perf_counter.h
> +++ b/include/linux/perf_counter.h
> @@ -102,6 +102,7 @@ enum perf_sw_ids {
> PERF_COUNT_SW_CPU_MIGRATIONS = 4,
> PERF_COUNT_SW_PAGE_FAULTS_MIN = 5,
> PERF_COUNT_SW_PAGE_FAULTS_MAJ = 6,
> + PERF_COUNT_SW_LOCK_ACQUIRES = 7,
>
> PERF_COUNT_SW_MAX, /* non-ABI */
> };
> diff --git a/kernel/perf_counter.c b/kernel/perf_counter.c
> index d55a50d..0261f9f 100644
> --- a/kernel/perf_counter.c
> +++ b/kernel/perf_counter.c
> @@ -3754,6 +3754,7 @@ static const struct pmu *sw_perf_counter_init(struct perf_counter *counter)
> case PERF_COUNT_SW_PAGE_FAULTS_MAJ:
> case PERF_COUNT_SW_CONTEXT_SWITCHES:
> case PERF_COUNT_SW_CPU_MIGRATIONS:
> + case PERF_COUNT_SW_LOCK_ACQUIRES:
> if (!counter->parent) {
> atomic_inc(&perf_swcounter_enabled[event]);
> counter->destroy = sw_perf_counter_destroy;
> diff --git a/kernel/spinlock.c b/kernel/spinlock.c
> index 7932653..394fc2d 100644
> --- a/kernel/spinlock.c
> +++ b/kernel/spinlock.c
> @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@
> #include <linux/interrupt.h>
> #include <linux/debug_locks.h>
> #include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/perf_counter.h>
>
> int __lockfunc _spin_trylock(spinlock_t *lock)
> {
> @@ -181,6 +182,9 @@ void __lockfunc _spin_lock(spinlock_t *lock)
> preempt_disable();
> spin_acquire(&lock->dep_map, 0, 0, _RET_IP_);
> LOCK_CONTENDED(lock, _raw_spin_trylock, _raw_spin_lock);
> + perf_swcounter_event(PERF_COUNT_SW_LOCK_ACQUIRES,
> + 1, 1, NULL, 0);
> +
> }
Hrm.. very much the wrong place to put this hook..
Maybe re-use the LOCK_CONTENDED macros for this, but I'm not sure we
want to go there and put code like this on the lock hot-paths for !debug
kernels.
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(_spin_lock);
> diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-stat.c b/tools/perf/builtin-stat.c
> index 2e03524..87511c0 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/builtin-stat.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-stat.c
> @@ -52,6 +52,7 @@ static struct perf_counter_attr default_attrs[] = {
> { .type = PERF_TYPE_SOFTWARE, .config = PERF_COUNT_SW_CONTEXT_SWITCHES},
> { .type = PERF_TYPE_SOFTWARE, .config = PERF_COUNT_SW_CPU_MIGRATIONS },
> { .type = PERF_TYPE_SOFTWARE, .config = PERF_COUNT_SW_PAGE_FAULTS },
> + { .type = PERF_TYPE_SOFTWARE, .config = PERF_COUNT_SW_LOCK_ACQUIRES },
>
> { .type = PERF_TYPE_HARDWARE, .config = PERF_COUNT_HW_CPU_CYCLES },
> { .type = PERF_TYPE_HARDWARE, .config = PERF_COUNT_HW_INSTRUCTIONS },
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/parse-events.c b/tools/perf/util/parse-events.c
> index 4d042f1..0cd4985 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/parse-events.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/parse-events.c
> @@ -38,6 +38,7 @@ static struct event_symbol event_symbols[] = {
> { CSW(PAGE_FAULTS_MAJ), "major-faults", "" },
> { CSW(CONTEXT_SWITCHES), "context-switches", "cs" },
> { CSW(CPU_MIGRATIONS), "cpu-migrations", "migrations" },
> + { CSW(LOCK_ACQUIRES), "lock-acquires", "lock" },
> };
>
> #define __PERF_COUNTER_FIELD(config, name) \
> @@ -66,6 +67,7 @@ static char *sw_event_names[] = {
> "CPU-migrations",
> "minor-faults",
> "major-faults",
> + "lock-acquires",
> };
>
> #define MAX_ALIASES 8
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists