linux-kernel - linux-next: manual merge of the percpu tree with the cpufreq-current tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20090708163709.fe7216b0.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:	Wed, 8 Jul 2009 16:37:09 +1000
From:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc:	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
	Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@...el.com>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the percpu tree with the
 cpufreq-current tree

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the percpu tree got a conflict in
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c between commit
5a75c82828e7c088ca6e7b4827911dc29cc8e774 ("[CPUFREQ] Cleanup locking in
ondemand governor") from the cpufreq-current tree and commit
245b2e70eabd797932adb263a65da0bab3711753 ("percpu: clean up percpu
variable definitions") from the percpu tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary.
-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@...b.auug.org.au

diff --cc drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c
index d6ba142,36f292a..0000000
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c
@@@ -70,15 -70,10 +70,15 @@@ struct cpu_dbs_info_s 
  	unsigned int freq_lo_jiffies;
  	unsigned int freq_hi_jiffies;
  	int cpu;
 -	unsigned int enable:1,
 -		sample_type:1;
 +	unsigned int sample_type:1;
 +	/*
 +	 * percpu mutex that serializes governor limit change with
 +	 * do_dbs_timer invocation. We do not want do_dbs_timer to run
 +	 * when user is changing the governor or limits.
 +	 */
 +	struct mutex timer_mutex;
  };
- static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct cpu_dbs_info_s, cpu_dbs_info);
+ static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct cpu_dbs_info_s, od_cpu_dbs_info);
  
  static unsigned int dbs_enable;	/* number of CPUs using this policy */
  
@@@ -190,13 -193,6 +191,13 @@@ static unsigned int powersave_bias_targ
  	return freq_hi;
  }
  
 +static void ondemand_powersave_bias_init_cpu(int cpu)
 +{
- 	struct cpu_dbs_info_s *dbs_info = &per_cpu(cpu_dbs_info, cpu);
++	struct cpu_dbs_info_s *dbs_info = &per_cpu(od_cpu_dbs_info, cpu);
 +	dbs_info->freq_table = cpufreq_frequency_get_table(cpu);
 +	dbs_info->freq_lo = 0;
 +}
 +
  static void ondemand_powersave_bias_init(void)
  {
  	int i;
@@@ -550,10 -569,9 +551,10 @@@ static int cpufreq_governor_dbs(struct 
  			return rc;
  		}
  
 +		dbs_enable++;
  		for_each_cpu(j, policy->cpus) {
  			struct cpu_dbs_info_s *j_dbs_info;
- 			j_dbs_info = &per_cpu(cpu_dbs_info, j);
+ 			j_dbs_info = &per_cpu(od_cpu_dbs_info, j);
  			j_dbs_info->cur_policy = policy;
  
  			j_dbs_info->prev_cpu_idle = get_cpu_idle_time(j,
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/