linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5/7] MAINTAINERS: Remove L: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1247035197.5124.9.camel@Joe-Laptop.home>
Date:	Tue, 07 Jul 2009 23:39:57 -0700
From:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To:	Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/7] MAINTAINERS: Remove L: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org

On Wed, 2009-07-08 at 09:32 +0300, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> Hi Joe,

Hi Pekka.

> On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 8:55 AM, Joe Perches<joe@...ches.com> wrote:
> > from sections that should not have them.
> What is that supposed to mean?

That there should be no sections that have LKML as a
list entry other than "everything".

A earlier commit, b5472cddbe2c41fd434592ecf3c5b81a551d5bea,
removed all the entries for LKML but "THE REST".
These removed entries have been added since that commit.

Having just a few sections show LKML as an entry
may lead people to think that LKML should not be
used as a CC entry unless it is specifically listed.

Documentation/SubmittingPatches already states that
LKML should be CC'd on all patches.

cheers, Joe

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/