| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <1247035481.15919.31.camel@penberg-laptop> Date: Wed, 08 Jul 2009 09:44:41 +0300 From: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi> To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@...il.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/7] MAINTAINERS: Remove L: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Hi Joe, On Tue, 2009-07-07 at 23:39 -0700, Joe Perches wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 8:55 AM, Joe Perches<joe@...ches.com> wrote: > > > from sections that should not have them. > > What is that supposed to mean? > > That there should be no sections that have LKML as a > list entry other than "everything". > > A earlier commit, b5472cddbe2c41fd434592ecf3c5b81a551d5bea, > removed all the entries for LKML but "THE REST". > These removed entries have been added since that commit. OK, I don't agree, but as Andrew apparently thinks it's a good idea because he merged the previous patch, there's no reason not to merge the new one. On Tue, 2009-07-07 at 23:39 -0700, Joe Perches wrote: > Documentation/SubmittingPatches already states that > LKML should be CC'd on all patches. Maybe it does, but real world doesn't seem to agree with you here. Pekka -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists