| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <a5d9929e0907081233s6fc42c15k710047a1b0dcc5bf@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 20:33:37 +0100 From: Joao Correia <joaomiguelcorreia@...il.com> To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl> Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Amerigo Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] Increase lockdep limits: MAX_LOCKDEP_CHAINS_BITS On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 8:32 PM, Joao Correia<joaomiguelcorreia@...il.com> wrote: > On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 7:34 PM, Peter Zijlstra<a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl> wrote: >> On Tue, 2009-07-07 at 16:25 +0100, Joao Correia wrote: >>> (Applies to current Linus tree, as of 2.6.31-rc2) >>> >>> A third limit becomes apparent as being too low after raising >>> MAX_STACK_TRACE_ENTRIES and MAX_LOCK_DEPTH, although this one is more >>> elusive to trigger. >> >> Would this involve reloading modules a lot? >> >> > > All the other limits were triggered immediatly upon boot. This one > happens during regular system usage, after a couple of hours. Not > loading more modules than needed, the system stays at around 45 > modules loaded, give or take. I do have qemu running, if that helps > anything. > > Joao Correia > qemu running as a -host-, not the system running inside it. Just to clear it up. Joao Correia -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists