[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1247126283.9777.318.camel@twins>
Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2009 09:58:03 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Cc: Jason Baron <jbaron@...hat.com>, mingo@...e.hu,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, paulus@...ba.org, rostedt@...dmis.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] perf_counter: add tracepoint support
On Thu, 2009-07-09 at 05:10 +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> (RFD parenthesis: why not using the one in kernel/trace for all perf events?
> Now that it is lockless, it would fit nicely inside: no fear about NMI
> context).
because that one doesn't have a single-buffer mode you can mmap().
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists