[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1247126556.9777.323.camel@twins>
Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2009 10:02:36 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To: Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
Cc: Joao Correia <joaomiguelcorreia@...il.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Américo Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] Increase lockdep limits: MAX_STACK_TRACE_ENTRIES
On Thu, 2009-07-09 at 00:39 -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 08:36:04PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > Looking at a lockdep dump hch gave me I can see that that is certainly
> > possible, I see tons of very deep callchains.
> >
> > /me wonders if we're getting significantly deeper..
>
> Looking at /proc/lockdep, I'm curious..
> Take a look at http://davej.fedorapeople.org/lockdep
> scroll down to c12c0924
>
> What's up with all those old_style_spin_init's ?
What kernel are you running? Does your lib/dma_debug.c:dma_debug_init()
have spin_lock_init() in that HASH_SIZE loop?
If so, then there's someone else doing silly, if not, you seriously need
to upgrade your kernel because you're running something ancient,
like .30 :-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists