[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200907091043.39607.trenn@suse.de>
Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 10:43:35 +0200
From: Thomas Renninger <trenn@...e.de>
To: Daniel Mack <daniel@...aq.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>,
Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@...el.com>,
rjw@...k.pl, mingo@...e.hu, Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@...el.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
Dave Young <hidave.darkstar@...il.com>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
sven.wegener@...aler.net, cpufreq@...r.kernel.org,
Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH] cpufreq: Unbreak build for !SMP: symlinked cpus cannot happen for !SMP
Or like that:
Either all #ifdef CONFIG_SMP related conditionals to managed cpus
should vanish or all should be covered. This one takes the latter
approach.
---
'managed_policy' is used for the non-smp case in line 941.
Make the symlink code conditional to #ifdef CONFIG_SMP as already
done at other places.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Renninger <trenn@...e.de>
Index: cpufreq/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
===================================================================
--- cpufreq.orig/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
+++ cpufreq/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
@@ -930,6 +930,7 @@ static int cpufreq_add_dev(struct sys_de
}
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cpufreq_driver_lock, flags);
+#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
/* symlink affected CPUs */
for_each_cpu(j, policy->cpus) {
if (j == cpu)
@@ -947,6 +948,7 @@ static int cpufreq_add_dev(struct sys_de
goto err_out_unregister;
}
}
+#endif
policy->governor = NULL; /* to assure that the starting sequence is
* run in cpufreq_set_policy */
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists