linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: Unbreak build for !SMP: symlinked cpus cannot happen for !SMP

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20090709084840.GR9464@buzzloop.caiaq.de>
Date:	Thu, 9 Jul 2009 10:48:40 +0200
From:	Daniel Mack <daniel@...aq.de>
To:	Thomas Renninger <trenn@...e.de>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>,
	Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@...el.com>,
	rjw@...k.pl, mingo@...e.hu, Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@...el.com>,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
	Dave Young <hidave.darkstar@...il.com>,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
	sven.wegener@...aler.net, cpufreq@...r.kernel.org,
	Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: Unbreak build for !SMP: symlinked cpus cannot
	happen for !SMP

On Thu, Jul 09, 2009 at 10:43:35AM +0200, Thomas Renninger wrote:
> Or like that:
> Either all #ifdef CONFIG_SMP related conditionals to managed cpus
> should vanish or all should be covered. This one takes the latter
> approach.

Dave Jones fixed it already, see

  http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=5e1596f75395e7a402e1059c518e633d2732dcf8

Daniel




> ---
> 'managed_policy' is used for the non-smp case in line 941.
> 
> Make the symlink code conditional to #ifdef CONFIG_SMP as already
> done at other places.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Renninger <trenn@...e.de>
> 
> Index: cpufreq/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> ===================================================================
> --- cpufreq.orig/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> +++ cpufreq/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> @@ -930,6 +930,7 @@ static int cpufreq_add_dev(struct sys_de
>  	}
>  	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cpufreq_driver_lock, flags);
>  
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
>  	/* symlink affected CPUs */
>  	for_each_cpu(j, policy->cpus) {
>  		if (j == cpu)
> @@ -947,6 +948,7 @@ static int cpufreq_add_dev(struct sys_de
>  			goto err_out_unregister;
>  		}
>  	}
> +#endif
>  
>  	policy->governor = NULL; /* to assure that the starting sequence is
>  				  * run in cpufreq_set_policy */
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/