[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1247144202.21295.869.camel@calx>
Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2009 07:56:42 -0500
From: Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@...mvista.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, oleg@...hat.com,
mingo@...e.hu, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] netpoll: Fix carrier detection for drivers that are
using phylib
On Thu, 2009-07-09 at 09:56 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-07-08 at 17:01 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > Looking at the people looking at SYSTEM_RUNNING, I do note some odd cases.
> > Why the heck does kernel/perf_counter.c do it, for example?
>
> Ah, those are the swcounter and other probe entry points. I've had
> several cases where we called into the perf counter code from those
> points before it was initialized, getting in kernel segfaults due to
> dereferencing uninitialized data etc..
>
> I could keep a variable that tracked the perf_counter_init() state, and
> use that instead if you prefer?
Looks like that'd be more accurate. Linus's proposed patch might break
your current assumptions.
--
http://selenic.com : development and support for Mercurial and Linux
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists