[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <28464.1247144463@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2009 14:01:03 +0100
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc: dhowells@...hat.com, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
jmorris@...ei.org, roland@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rework/fix is_single_threaded()
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com> wrote:
> Unless David replies.
Sorry, I missed the last three messages.
> David, do you still dislike ->mmap_sem? I didn't see other objections,
> and again, imho tasklist_lock is worse.
My main objection to taking mmap_sem is that it restricts where the function
can be used. It can't, for example, be called by anyone holding a spinlock.
Furthermore, the more locks, the more chance of someone accidentally
deadlocking something.
But apart from that, go for it.
David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists