[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090710005957.GA32555@gondor.apana.org.au>
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 08:59:57 +0800
From: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: fengguang.wu@...el.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: sk_lock: inconsistent {RECLAIM_FS-ON-W} -> {IN-RECLAIM_FS-W}
usage
On Thu, Jul 09, 2009 at 05:13:55PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
>
> I think this specific case needs more thinking.
>
> If the allocation fails, and it's GFP_ATOMIC, we are going to yield()
> (which sleeps) and loop endlessly waiting for the allocation to
> succeed.
Indeed. We could do one of the following:
1) Preallocate, either universally or conditinally on sk_allocation.
2) Set a bit somewhere to indicate FIN and retry the allocation as
part of retransmit.
Cheers,
--
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists