[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20090709.171355.09466097.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2009 17:13:55 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: fengguang.wu@...el.com
Cc: herbert@...dor.apana.org.au, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: sk_lock: inconsistent {RECLAIM_FS-ON-W} -> {IN-RECLAIM_FS-W}
usage
From: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 21:17:46 +0800
> @@ -2100,7 +2100,8 @@ void tcp_send_fin(struct sock *sk)
> } else {
> /* Socket is locked, keep trying until memory is available. */
> for (;;) {
> - skb = alloc_skb_fclone(MAX_TCP_HEADER, GFP_KERNEL);
> + skb = alloc_skb_fclone(MAX_TCP_HEADER,
> + sk->sk_allocation);
> if (skb)
> break;
> yield();
I think this specific case needs more thinking.
If the allocation fails, and it's GFP_ATOMIC, we are going to yield()
(which sleeps) and loop endlessly waiting for the allocation to
succeed.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists