linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH Resend2] Remove 'SBC8240 Wind River' Device Driver Code

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1247216007.29541.2.camel@macbook.infradead.org>
Date:	Fri, 10 Jul 2009 09:53:27 +0100
From:	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
To:	subrata@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc:	dedekind@...radead.org, Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@...il.com>,
	linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, carolyn.j.smith@...ate.tek.com,
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	Jim Cromie <jim.cromie@...il.com>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linuxppc-dev <Linuxppc-dev@...abs.org>,
	Sachin P Sant <sachinp@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	linux-next <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
	Scott Wood <scottwood@...escale.com>,
	Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH Resend2] Remove 'SBC8240 Wind River' Device Driver Code

On Fri, 2009-07-10 at 14:17 +0530, Subrata Modak wrote:
> Is it possible to get this patch through and before 2.6.31 stable is
> released ?

Hm, I was ignoring this until I was sure all the last-minute fixes for
2.6.31 were out of the way; I was planning to submit it for 2.6.32.

Do we really need to submit it for 2.6.31? It's not a regression, is it?
It's been like this for _ages_.

-- 
David Woodhouse                            Open Source Technology Centre
David.Woodhouse@...el.com                              Intel Corporation

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/