[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1247216324.6630.10.camel@subratamodak.linux.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 14:28:44 +0530
From: Subrata Modak <subrata@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
Cc: dedekind@...radead.org, Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@...il.com>,
linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, carolyn.j.smith@...ate.tek.com,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Jim Cromie <jim.cromie@...il.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linuxppc-dev <Linuxppc-dev@...abs.org>,
Sachin P Sant <sachinp@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-next <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Scott Wood <scottwood@...escale.com>,
Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH Resend2] Remove 'SBC8240 Wind River' Device Driver Code
On Fri, 2009-07-10 at 09:53 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-07-10 at 14:17 +0530, Subrata Modak wrote:
> > Is it possible to get this patch through and before 2.6.31 stable is
> > released ?
>
Hi David,
> Hm, I was ignoring this until I was sure all the last-minute fixes for
> 2.6.31 were out of the way; I was planning to submit it for 2.6.32.
>
> Do we really need to submit it for 2.6.31? It's not a regression, is it?
> It's been like this for _ages_.
True. But it gives annoying build fails on randconfig next trees. And
we(Sachin & myself) has been reporting it from March/April. If you feel
there is still room to be pushed to 2.6.31, then please do it. Else,
2.6.32 will be fine. Thanks for your support.
Regards--
Subrata
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists