[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090710093825.GJ14666@wotan.suse.de>
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 11:38:25 +0200
From: Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Janboe Ye <yuan-bo.ye@...orola.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, vegard.nossum@...il.com,
graydon@...hat.com, fche@...hat.com, cl@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] Check write to slab memory which freed already using mudflap
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 02:31:43AM -0700, David Rientjes wrote:
> On Fri, 10 Jul 2009, Pekka Enberg wrote:
>
> > > I'm not sure what the status of slqb is, although I would have expected it
> > > to have been pushed for inclusion in 2.6.31 as a slab allocator
> > > alternative. Nick, any forecast for inclusion?
> >
> > 2.6.32 most likely. Nick has fixed a bunch of problems but there's still
> > one ppc boot time bug that's turning out to be hard to find.
> >
>
> Ah, ok, there's still outstanding bugs. I was curious as to why it wasn't
> merged as a non-default option that would have perhaps attracted more
> attention to it.
Don't know whether it should go in as non-default or not. The plan
is to kind of kick up a stink and make people care about the slab
issue again rather than quietly add more slab allocators to the
tree...
Perhaps making it non-default for one release would be a good idea,
I don't know.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists