[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1247187904-31999-9-git-send-email-fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 10:04:57 +0900
From: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...abs.org,
benh@...nel.crashing.org, tony.luck@...el.com, x86@...nel.org,
fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp, beckyb@...nel.crashing.org
Subject: [PATCH 08/15] powerpc: add dma_capable() to replace is_buffer_dma_capable()
dma_capable() eventually replaces is_buffer_dma_capable(), which tells
if a memory area is dma-capable or not. The problem of
is_buffer_dma_capable() is that it doesn't take a pointer to struct
device so it doesn't work for POWERPC.
Signed-off-by: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>
---
arch/powerpc/include/asm/dma-mapping.h | 13 +++++++++++++
1 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/dma-mapping.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/dma-mapping.h
index b44aaab..6ff1f85 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/dma-mapping.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/dma-mapping.h
@@ -424,6 +424,19 @@ static inline int dma_mapping_error(struct device *dev, dma_addr_t dma_addr)
#endif
}
+static inline bool dma_capable(struct device *dev, dma_addr_t addr, size_t size)
+{
+ struct dma_mapping_ops *ops = get_dma_ops(dev);
+
+ if (ops->addr_needs_map && ops->addr_needs_map(dev, addr, size))
+ return 0;
+
+ if (!dev->dma_mask)
+ return 0;
+
+ return addr + size <= *dev->dma_mask;
+}
+
#define dma_alloc_noncoherent(d, s, h, f) dma_alloc_coherent(d, s, h, f)
#define dma_free_noncoherent(d, s, v, h) dma_free_coherent(d, s, v, h)
#ifdef CONFIG_NOT_COHERENT_CACHE
--
1.6.0.6
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists