[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1247187904-31999-8-git-send-email-fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 10:04:56 +0900
From: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...abs.org,
benh@...nel.crashing.org, tony.luck@...el.com, x86@...nel.org,
fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp, beckyb@...nel.crashing.org
Subject: [PATCH 07/15] ia64: add dma_capable() to replace is_buffer_dma_capable()
dma_capable() eventually replaces is_buffer_dma_capable(), which tells
if a memory area is dma-capable or not. The problem of
is_buffer_dma_capable() is that it doesn't take a pointer to struct
device so it doesn't work for POWERPC.
Signed-off-by: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>
---
arch/ia64/include/asm/dma-mapping.h | 8 ++++++++
1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/ia64/include/asm/dma-mapping.h b/arch/ia64/include/asm/dma-mapping.h
index 5a61b5c..88d0f86 100644
--- a/arch/ia64/include/asm/dma-mapping.h
+++ b/arch/ia64/include/asm/dma-mapping.h
@@ -69,6 +69,14 @@ dma_set_mask (struct device *dev, u64 mask)
return 0;
}
+static inline bool dma_capable(struct device *dev, dma_addr_t addr, size_t size)
+{
+ if (!dev->dma_mask)
+ return 0;
+
+ return addr + size <= *dev->dma_mask;
+}
+
extern int dma_get_cache_alignment(void);
static inline void
--
1.6.0.6
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists