[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090710212853.GB30322@shareable.org>
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 22:28:53 +0100
From: Jamie Lokier <jamie@...reable.org>
To: tridge@...ba.org
Cc: Martin Steigerwald <Martin@...htvoll.de>,
Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ozas.de>,
OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp>,
Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, john.lanza@...ux.com,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
Dave Kleikamp <shaggy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>, corbet@....net,
jcm@...masters.org, James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com
Subject: Re: CONFIG_VFAT_FS_DUALNAMES regressions
tridge@...ba.org wrote:
> I haven't tested against w2k yet. I'll need to dig through my old MSDN
> CD stack and see if I can find a w2k CD to test with. It's no longer
> offered on current MSDN subscriptions.
Windows NT-derivatives and Windows 95-derivatives use a significantly
different code base for their filesystems, even to the extent of
having different VFAT behaviour. Hence shortnames=win95, shortname=winnt.
The last Windows 95-derivative is Windows ME, which is was released
about the same time as Windows 2000. Windows 2000 is an NT-derivative.
So it might be worth testing against Windows ME.
I don't know what code base is used for Windows CE. CE is still used,
on phones, PDAs and media players among other things. Has there been
any testing against CE - current versions and old versions?
-- Jamie
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists