lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.01.0907092029200.3352@localhost.localdomain>
Date:	Thu, 9 Jul 2009 20:31:03 -0700 (PDT)
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Amerigo Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
cc:	Changli Gao <xiaosuo@...il.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: PATCH: fd leak if pipe() is called with an invalid address.



On Fri, 10 Jul 2009, Amerigo Wang wrote:

> On Thu, Jul 02, 2009 at 03:21:55PM +0800, Changli Gao wrote:
> >fd leak if pipe() is called with an invalid address.
> >
> >Though -EFAULT is returned, the file descriptors opened by pipe() call
> >are left open.
> >
> >Signed-off-by: Changli Gao <xiaosuo@...il.com>
> >----
> >
> > x86/ia32/sys_ia32.c     |    5 ++++-
> > xtensa/kernel/syscall.c |    5 ++++-
> > 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> >
> >--- arch/x86/ia32/sys_ia32.c.orig	2009-07-02 15:08:39.000000000 +0800
> >+++ arch/x86/ia32/sys_ia32.c	2009-07-02 15:09:49.000000000 +0800
> 
> This patch is not correctly made... You need to make the patch in the
> _upper_ directory of the top source code tree (if you don't use git),
> so that we can apply it with 'patch -p1 < XXX'.
> 
> Probably this is the reason why Linus still doesn't merge it.

No, the main reason I haven't merged it is that I don't think the patch is 
worth it. 

If you give a bad area to pipe(), there's no point in closign the file 
descriptors. It's a user-space bug. You got your file descriptors, you 
just don't know what the hell they are, because your program is sh*t. 
There's no point in the kernel trying to clean up, because the cleaned-up 
state is not any better.

			Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ