linux-kernel - Re: [GIT-PULL] includecheck fixes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20090710033520.GA2458@kroah.com>
Date:	Thu, 9 Jul 2009 20:35:20 -0700
From:	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To:	Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinder@...nel.org>
Cc:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Kevin Hilman <khilman@...prootsystems.com>,
	David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>, benh@...nel.crashing.org,
	paulus@...ba.org, schwidefsky@...ibm.com,
	heiko.carstens@...ibm.com, jdike@...toit.com,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>,
	dbrownell@...rs.sourceforge.net, mchehab@...radead.org,
	jeremy@...source.com, felixb@....com, lenb@...nel.org,
	airlied@...ux.ie, bcrl@...ck.org,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Russell King <rmk+lkml@....linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [GIT-PULL] includecheck fixes

On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 08:29:15AM +0530, Jaswinder Singh Rajput wrote:
> Hello Greg,
> 
> On Thu, 2009-07-09 at 15:26 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 12:10:09AM +0530, Jaswinder Singh Rajput wrote:
> > > Linus,
> > > 
> > > Please pull includecheck fixes, these all are clean and safe patches
> > > with relevant Acks.
> > 
> > Shouldn't stuff like this go through the trivial tree?  And stuff like
> > that is relevant for the main pre-rc1 merge, not this late in the merge
> > cycle, right?
> > 
> 
> You did not specified what is your problem ? and where was you when we
> discussed it earlier ?

Earlier when?  I responded to your query about the individual patches
you copied me on, saying they were in my "to-apply" queue and I didn't
want them to go to Linus at this point in time.  You seem quite rushed
about these patches, which is odd to me.

> Normally brain is above then the eyes, do you know why ?
> 
> To use your brain instead of follow things blindly.
> 
> The point of watching patches for some time means test and wait so that
> they can show their real faces.

Which is what I am asking you to do here.  So why are you arguing with
this concept?

> BTW, it is not late, it is not going to hit stable in next week or so.
> 
> Keeping these sane patches waiting for complete cycle will be insaner.

Accepting trivial patches like these, for which a full build cycle of
all arches has yet to be accomplished due to a lack of inclusion in the
-next tree, at a point in the development series in which bug fixes and
regressions are the only thing to be accepted, seems to be a risk, don't
you think?

But hey, I'm not Linus, it's up to him to decide to take untested stuff
like this or not, not me :)

best of luck,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/