[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4A5AD963.5070908@msgid.tls.msk.ru>
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2009 10:51:15 +0400
From: Michael Tokarev <mjt@....msk.ru>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
CC: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
Linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: compat ioctl32 for /dev/snapshot?
Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Sunday 12 July 2009, Michael Tokarev wrote:
>> As I mentioned in my first email, I'm not the right person to
>> do the patch. But regardless, I spent about a day understanding
>> this stuff (or trying to, anyway) - 100% useless day - and when
>> I thought I have a patch someone else spoken up and said this
>> way (compat_ioctl) is the wrong approach now. And sent another,
>> also trivial patch, adding compat calls right to the proper
>> place in kernel/power.c. Which (the patch) has been ignored
>> too.
>
> I never got a reply from you saying whether or not the patch
> I sent actually worked. If you or someone else can confirm it,
> I'll resend with the fixes you mentioned.
In order to (try to) check if it works or not, another userspace
component has to be fixed to support 32/64 bit mode. It's uswsusp,
which currently assumes swap space structures are all 32bits. So
it isn't possible to immediately check if it works or not -- just
ioctl(s) aren't enough. Complete fix (kernel+user space) requires
both, fixing all remaining (yet unknown) issues in old and new
code on the way.
For now, I think it's best to let Pavel or Rafael to decide what
to do with all this.
Thanks!
/mjt
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists