[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090713065917.GO14666@wotan.suse.de>
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2009 08:59:17 +0200
From: Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@...asas.com>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [rfc][patch 3/4] fs: new truncate sequence
On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 10:47:18AM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 11:55:51AM +0300, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
> > I wish you would split it.
> >
> > one - helper to be called by converted file systems
> > (Which just ignores the ATTR_SIZE)
> > second - to be set into .setattr which does the simple_setsize + above.
> >
> > More clear for FS users like me (and that ugly unmask of ATTR_SIZE)
> >
> > or it's just me?
>
> Yeah, that seems be a lot cleaner. But let's wait until we got
> rid of ->truncate for all filesystems to have the bigger picture.
Agreed, if it is a common sequence / requirement for filesystems
then of course I will not object to a helper to make things clearer
or share code.
I would like to see inode_setattr renamed into simple_setattr, and
then also .setattr made mandatory, so I don't like to cut code out
of inode_setattr which makes it unable to be the simple_setattr
after the old truncate code is removed.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists