lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5d5443650907130152t420e9426q762c24bdb1b29aae@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 13 Jul 2009 14:22:10 +0530
From:	Trilok Soni <soni.trilok@...il.com>
To:	Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
Cc:	Kim Kyuwon <chammoru@...il.com>, Kim Kyuwon <q1.kim@...sung.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-input@...r.kernel.org,
	Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>,
	Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Input: add MAX7359 key switch controller driver, v2

Hi Dmitry,

On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 11:08 PM, Trilok Soni<soni.trilok@...il.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 8:42 AM, Dmitry
> Torokhov<dmitry.torokhov@...il.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 11:34:54AM +0900, Kim Kyuwon wrote:
>>> Hi Trilok,
>>>
>>> On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 2:27 AM, Trilok Soni <soni.trilok@...il.com> wrote:
>>> > Hi Kim,
>>> >
>>> > On Sat, May 9, 2009 at 7:39 AM, Kim Kyuwon <q1.kim@...sung.com> wrote:
>>> >> The Maxim MAX7359 is a I2C interfaced key switch controller which provides
>>> >> microprocessors with management of up to 64 key switches.
>>> >> This patch adds support for the MAX7359 key switch controller.
>>> >>
>>> >> Signed-off-by: Kim Kyuwon <q1.kim@...sung.com>
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Thanks for implementing review comments. Please add
>>> >
>>> > Reviewed-by: Trilok Soni <soni.trilok@...il.com>
>>>
>>> Sorry, I didn't know I should put the "Reviewed-by" in the reviewed
>>> patch.(I'm still kernelnewbie :) )
>>
>> You are not supposed to add it until somebody explicitely asks you to
>> do that, same with Acked-by... The reason is that these tags constitute
>> certain endorsement of the patch and while one person may review the
>> patch he/she may not yet feel that review process is complete. Hope this
>> makes some sense...
>>
>>> If possible, I want Dmitry to add
>>> "Reviewed-by" when he sends this driver to mainline, or I will send
>>> new patch again.
>>>
>>
>> I have it added to my copy.

I don't see this driver picked up yet in your -next branch. We should
target this driver to be mainlined in next merge window. This is very
important driver for some of the embedded systems, including palm pre
:)

http://triloksoni.wordpress.com
http://www.linkedin.com/in/triloksoni
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ