linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] fs/xfs: Drop unnecessary NULL test

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 14 Jul 2009 14:15:42 +0200 (CEST)
From:	Julia Lawall <julia@...u.dk>
To:	Olaf Weber <olaf@....com>
Cc:	felixb@....com, xfs-masters@....sgi.com, xfs@....sgi.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] fs/xfs: Drop unnecessary NULL test

On Tue, 14 Jul 2009, Olaf Weber wrote:

> Julia Lawall writes:
> 
> > From: Julia Lawall <julia@...u.dk>
> > The result of container_of should not be NULL.  In particular, in this case
> > the argument to the enclosing function has passed though INIT_DELAYED_WORK,
> > which dereferences it, implying that its container cannot be NULL.
> 
> Given the defn of container_of() it seems clear that neither its input
> pointer nor its result should ever be NULL.

container_of just does pointer arithmetic.  The result of that arithmetic 
can be NULL, ie if the argument was obtained from an expression of the 
form &x->f where x was NULL.  But in principle, values should be checked 
for NULL beforehand.

julia
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/