[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1247754491.6586.23.camel@laptop>
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2009 16:28:11 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
"riel@...hat.com" <riel@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"tytso@....edu" <tytso@....edu>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"elladan@...imo.com" <elladan@...imo.com>,
"npiggin@...e.de" <npiggin@...e.de>,
"Barnes, Jesse" <jesse.barnes@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: count only reclaimable lru pages
On Thu, 2009-07-16 at 22:25 +0800, Wu Fengguang wrote:
> > Reclaimable? Are all pages on the LRUs truly reclaimable?
>
> No, only possibly reclaimable :)
>
> What would you suggest? In fact I'm not totally comfortable with it.
> Maybe it would be safer to simply stick with the old _lru_pages
> naming?
Nah, I like the reclaimable name, these pages are at least potentially
reclaimable.
lru_pages() is definately not correct anymore since you exclude the
unevictable and possibly the anon pages.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists