[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.1.10.0907161037590.7930@gentwo.org>
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2009 10:39:17 -0400 (EDT)
From: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
cc: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
"riel@...hat.com" <riel@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"tytso@....edu" <tytso@....edu>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"elladan@...imo.com" <elladan@...imo.com>,
"npiggin@...e.de" <npiggin@...e.de>,
"Barnes, Jesse" <jesse.barnes@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: count only reclaimable lru pages
On Thu, 16 Jul 2009, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > What would you suggest? In fact I'm not totally comfortable with it.
> > Maybe it would be safer to simply stick with the old _lru_pages
> > naming?
>
> Nah, I like the reclaimable name, these pages are at least potentially
> reclaimable.
>
> lru_pages() is definately not correct anymore since you exclude the
> unevictable and possibly the anon pages.
Well lets at least add a comment at the beginning of the functions
explaining that these are potentially reclaimable and list some of the
types of pages that may not be reclaimable.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists