[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090716145542.GA14691@srcf.ucam.org>
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2009 15:55:42 +0100
From: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>
Cc: Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-ide@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] scsi: Allow hosts to be flagged as hotpluggable
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 02:53:29PM +0000, James Bottomley wrote:
> Well, a flag that says 'hotplug' and means both the controller and bus
> support hotplugging might be SCSI specific. However, the fact is that
> most people make such a determination on the bus type, so it's a bit
> redundant (in true SCSI there really is no controller on a hotplug bus
> that doesn't support hotplug because they can't scan the bus without
> it). If you intend to use it to make link power management decisions,
> that's completely different because SAS PM support still isn't
> standardised and most of the rest of SCSI doesn't have it either. So it
> sounds to me you're looking for a flag that says "might have a problem
> with SATA link power management" ... in which case this is currently
> libata specific. We might be able to expand it to libsas if (when) we
> actually get link power management standardised, but a lot of the other
> busses aren't even going to have a concept of link power management.
Makes sense. I'll respin it as a libata feature.
--
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@...f.ucam.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists