linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 18/20] ceph: debugging

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0907171247570.23194@cobra.newdream.net>
Date:	Fri, 17 Jul 2009 12:52:33 -0700 (PDT)
From:	Sage Weil <sage@...dream.net>
To:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
cc:	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 18/20] ceph: debugging

On Fri, 17 Jul 2009, Andi Kleen wrote:
> Good.
> 
> Sorry for not doing more (and more serious) reviews, not enough
> time right now.

You've been helpful nonetheless, thanks! :)

> > #define _dout(fmt, args...)						\
> > 	pr_debug(" %12.12s:%-4d : " fmt "%s",				\
> > 		 ceph_file_part(__FILE__, sizeof(__FILE__)),		\
> > 		 __LINE__, args);
> 
> That seems like a wasteful way to do this -- i bet you could
> shrink binary size with debugging on considerably if you move
> the file_part into a function.

If you mean ceph_file_part shouldn't be inline, definitely.  Beyond that 
I'm not sure what more to change... it's just a few extra chars on the 
format string and 2 calls instead of 1?

sage
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/