[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4A63C09A.80904@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2009 08:55:54 +0800
From: Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>
To: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tracing: dont reset set_ftrace_filter/notrace when opened
with r/w perm
Jiri Olsa wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 05:37:24PM +0800, Li Zefan wrote:
>> Jiri Olsa wrote:
>>> If user setup set_ftrace_filter/set_ftrace_notrace files and then opens them
>>> with read&write permissions, the previous setup will be removed.
>>>
>> Currently:
>>
>> # echo 'sys_open sys_close' > set_ftrace_filter
>> # cat set_ftrace_filter
>> sys_open
>> sys_close
>>
>> After your patch:
>>
>> # echo 'sys_open sys_close' > set_ftrace_filter
>> # cat set_ftrace_filter
>> sys_close
>>
>
> oops, sry I missed this..
>
> Following patch adds new FTRACE_ITER_RESET flag, as the decision needs
> to be taken in "open" and applied in "write". I'm not sure whats the
> policy for adding new flags, but it looks ok to me.
>
I have no strong opinion whether to do the reset in "open" or in first
"write".
All said, I think this is cleaner, without introducing a new flag:
@@ -2260,6 +2256,9 @@ ftrace_regex_write(struct file *file, const char __user *ubuf,
return 0;
mutex_lock(&ftrace_regex_lock);
+ if (file->f_pos == 0 &&
+ (file->f_mode & FMODE_WRITE) && !(file->f_flags & O_APPEND))
+ ftrace_filter_reset(enable);
if (file->f_mode & FMODE_READ) {
struct seq_file *m = file->private_data;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists