[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4A63C00A.2070805@zytor.com>
Date: Sun, 19 Jul 2009 17:53:30 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Siarhei Liakh <sliakh.lkml@...il.com>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andi Kleen <ak@....de>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
linux-cris-kernel@...s.com, Roland Dreier <rdreier@...co.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: Reducing footprint of BIOS32 service mappings
Siarhei Liakh wrote:
> According to BIOS32 specification
> (http://members.datafast.net.au/dft0802/specs/bios32.pdf), at most two
> pages per BIOS32 service should be set executable and no pages need to
> be writeable. This patch modifies bios32_service() to set proper page
> access permissions at time of service discovery, as described in the
> specification.
> Further, hardcoded protection of memory area between 640k to 1Mb have
> been removed from static_protections(), since only pages mentioned
> above need to be executable, not whole BIOS region.
>
> The patch have been developed for Linux 2.6.30 x86 by Siarhei Liakh
> <sliakh.lkml@...il.com> and Xuxian Jiang <jiang@...ncsu.edu>.
>
Specifications mean little in the BIOS space, unfortunately. Do we have
any notion about how many machines this has been tested on?
-hpa
--
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists