[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1248143636.9140.4.camel@subratamodak.linux.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2009 08:03:55 +0530
From: Subrata Modak <subrata@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: linux-laptop@...r.kernel.org,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Sachin P Sant <sachinp@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/06] Fix compilation warning for
arch/x86/kernel/apm_32.c
On Sat, 2009-07-18 at 16:13 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Subrata Modak <subrata@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> > Following fix is inspired by David Howells fix few days back:
> > http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/7/9/109,
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Subrata Modak<subrata@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
> > ---
> >
> > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/apm_32.c 2009-06-15 07:50:51.000000000 +0530
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/apm_32.c 2009-07-15 06:43:59.000000000 +0530
> > @@ -811,7 +811,7 @@ static int apm_do_idle(void)
> > u8 ret = 0;
> > int idled = 0;
> > int polling;
> > - int err;
> > + int uninitialized_var(err);
>
> Please dont use uninitialized_var() as it's dangerous - in something
> as performance-uncritical as this we should initialize it to 0 and
> mention it in the changelog that this works around a GCC false
> positive warning.
Sure. Resending as you suggested.
Regards--
Subrata
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists