[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1248212925.10466.143.camel@calx>
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2009 16:48:45 -0500
From: Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>
To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc: linux-embedded@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Tim Bird <tim.bird@...sony.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] move __devinit or __init printk constant format strings
to __devinitconst or __initdata?
On Tue, 2009-07-21 at 14:20 -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> Is moving constant string formats to __devinitconst or __initdata
> useful for embedded environments?
>
> As in:
>
> #define printk_section(section, fmt, ...) \
> ({ static const section char __fmt[] = fmt; printk(__fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__); })
>
> #define pr_err_section(section, fmt, ...) \
> printk_section(section, KERN_ERR pr_fmt(fmt), ##__VA_ARGS__)
>
> with a use of:
>
> static int __devinit foo_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> if (bar())
> pr_err_section(__devinitconst,
> "A long error message\n");
> }
>
> or
>
> static int __init foo_init(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> if (bar())
> pr_err_section(__initdata,
> "A long error message\n");
> }
Interesting notion, but not worth the trouble in my mind. I think it's
more worthwhile to look into automatic such stuff in the build somehow.
--
http://selenic.com : development and support for Mercurial and Linux
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists