[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1248213403.31365.343.camel@Joe-Laptop.home>
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2009 14:56:43 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>
Cc: linux-embedded@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Tim Bird <tim.bird@...sony.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] move __devinit or __init printk constant format strings
to __devinitconst or __initdata?
On Tue, 2009-07-21 at 16:48 -0500, Matt Mackall wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-07-21 at 14:20 -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > Is moving constant string formats to __devinitconst or __initdata
> > useful for embedded environments?
> > As in:
> > #define printk_section(section, fmt, ...) \
> > ({ static const section char __fmt[] = fmt; printk(__fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__); })
> > #define pr_err_section(section, fmt, ...) \
> > printk_section(section, KERN_ERR pr_fmt(fmt), ##__VA_ARGS__)
> > with a use of:
> > static int __devinit foo_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > {
> > if (bar())
> > pr_err_section(__devinitconst,
> > "A long error message\n");
> > }
> Interesting notion, but not worth the trouble in my mind. I think it's
> more worthwhile to look into automatic such stuff in the build somehow.
I think it's not possible today to get gcc to mark
the format strings without source modification.
It's pretty easy to script a source conversion.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists