| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <4A67BBDC.7040207@zytor.com> Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2009 18:24:44 -0700 From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com> To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> CC: Mike Rapoport <mike@...pulab.co.il>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, denis@...pulab.co.il Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add reboot fixup for SBC-fitPC2 On 07/22/2009 05:38 PM, Andrew Morton wrote: > > Neither this patch nor Denis's earlier version contained an adequate > decription. We aren't told what these "problems" are, so we're unable > to judge the appropriateness of patch. > > Both patches were wordwrapped. > > Both patches use an atypical layout style for the comments. > > I fixed up some of these things and merged the patch into my tree, for > sending to Ingo for 2.6.32. > > Please send a description of the problem which the patch fixes and I > shall add that to my copy of the changelog. > I queued up an equivalent cleaned up version for tip:x86/urgent that I was planning to push to Linus. However, as you quite correctly point out the comments in this file are pretty darn pointless; they add absolutely no information over what is already in the data structure. -hpa -- H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists