[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9443f91bd4648e6214b32acff4512b97.squirrel@webmail-b.css.fujitsu.com>
Date: Sat, 25 Jul 2009 12:15:10 +0900 (JST)
From: "KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki" <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
To: "KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki" <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: "KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki" <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"David Rientjes" <rientjes@...gle.com>, lee.schermerhorn@...com,
kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com, miaox@...fujitsu.com,
mingo@...e.hu, a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl, cl@...ux-foundation.org,
menage@...gle.com, nickpiggin@...oo.com.au, y-goto@...fujitsu.com,
penberg@...helsinki.fi, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [BUG] set_mempolicy(MPOL_INTERLEAV) cause kernel panic
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
> KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
> Then, here is a much easier fix. for trusting cpuset more.
>
just a memo about memory hotplug
_Direct_ use of task->mems_allowed is only in cpuset and mempolicy.
If no policy is used, it's not checked.
(See alloc_pages_current())
memory hotplug's notifier just updates top_cpuset's mems_allowed.
But it doesn't update each task's ones.
Then, task's bahavior is
- tasks which don't use mempolicy will use all nodes, N_HIGH_MEMORY.
- tasks under cpuset will be controlled under their own cpuset.
- tasks under mempolicy will use their own policy.
but no new policy is re-calculated and, then, no new mask.
Now, even if all memory on nodes a removed, pgdat just remains.
Then, cpuset/mempolicy will never access NODE_DATA(nid) which is NULL.
Thanks,
-Kame
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists