lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2f11576a0907250621w3696fdc0pe61638c8c935c981@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Sat, 25 Jul 2009 22:21:29 +0900
From:	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
To:	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>, lee.schermerhorn@...com,
	miaox@...fujitsu.com, mingo@...e.hu, a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl,
	cl@...ux-foundation.org, menage@...gle.com,
	nickpiggin@...oo.com.au, y-goto@...fujitsu.com,
	penberg@...helsinki.fi, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [BUG] set_mempolicy(MPOL_INTERLEAV) cause kernel panic

2009/07/25 12:15 に KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki<kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com> さんは書きました:
> KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
>> KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
>> Then, here is a much easier fix. for trusting cpuset more.
>>
> just a memo about memory hotplug
>
> _Direct_ use of task->mems_allowed is only in cpuset and mempolicy.
> If no policy is used, it's not checked.
> (See alloc_pages_current())
>
> memory hotplug's notifier just updates top_cpuset's mems_allowed.
> But it doesn't update each task's ones.
> Then, task's bahavior is
>
>  - tasks which don't use mempolicy will use all nodes, N_HIGH_MEMORY.
>  - tasks under cpuset will be controlled under their own cpuset.
>  - tasks under mempolicy will use their own policy.
>   but no new policy is re-calculated and, then, no new mask.
>
> Now, even if all memory on nodes a removed, pgdat just remains.
> Then, cpuset/mempolicy will never access NODE_DATA(nid) which is NULL.

Umm..
I don't think this is optimal behavior. but if hotplug guys agree
this, I agree this too.

Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ