[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2f11576a0907250621w3696fdc0pe61638c8c935c981@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 25 Jul 2009 22:21:29 +0900
From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>, lee.schermerhorn@...com,
miaox@...fujitsu.com, mingo@...e.hu, a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl,
cl@...ux-foundation.org, menage@...gle.com,
nickpiggin@...oo.com.au, y-goto@...fujitsu.com,
penberg@...helsinki.fi, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [BUG] set_mempolicy(MPOL_INTERLEAV) cause kernel panic
2009/07/25 12:15 に KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki<kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com> さんは書きました:
> KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
>> KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
>> Then, here is a much easier fix. for trusting cpuset more.
>>
> just a memo about memory hotplug
>
> _Direct_ use of task->mems_allowed is only in cpuset and mempolicy.
> If no policy is used, it's not checked.
> (See alloc_pages_current())
>
> memory hotplug's notifier just updates top_cpuset's mems_allowed.
> But it doesn't update each task's ones.
> Then, task's bahavior is
>
> - tasks which don't use mempolicy will use all nodes, N_HIGH_MEMORY.
> - tasks under cpuset will be controlled under their own cpuset.
> - tasks under mempolicy will use their own policy.
> but no new policy is re-calculated and, then, no new mask.
>
> Now, even if all memory on nodes a removed, pgdat just remains.
> Then, cpuset/mempolicy will never access NODE_DATA(nid) which is NULL.
Umm..
I don't think this is optimal behavior. but if hotplug guys agree
this, I agree this too.
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists