linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V2] au1xmmc: dev_pm

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20090726150834.GB27022@sirena.org.uk>
Date:	Sun, 26 Jul 2009 16:08:34 +0100
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Cc:	Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
	Frans Pop <elendil@...net.nl>,
	Manuel Lauss <manuel.lauss@...glemail.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mips@...ux-mips.org,
	Manuel Lauss <manuel.lauss@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] au1xmmc: dev_pm_ops conversion

On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 09:39:30PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:

> Yes, they would.  In general, you'd probably want to do something like this:

> static struct dev_pm_ops au1xmmc_pmops = {
> 	.resume		= au1xmmc_resume,
> 	.suspend		= au1xmmc_suspend,
> 	.freeze		= au1xmmc_resume,
> 	.thaw		= au1xmmc_suspend,

I'd have expected freeze and thaw to be the other way around here?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/